Web 2.0 vs. the Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment

Episteme, volume 6, 2009, Pages 25-37
DOI 10.3366/E174236000800052X

The paper develops some of the conclusions, reached in Floridi (2007), concerning the future developments of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and their impact on our lives.

The two main theses supported in that article were that, as the information society develops, the threshold between online and offline is becoming increasingly blurred, and that once there won't be any significant difference, we shall gradually re-conceptualise ourselves not as cyborgs but rather as inforgs, i.e. socially connected, informational organisms.

In this paper, I look at the development of the so-called Semantic Web and Web 2.0 from this perspective and try to forecast their future. Regarding the Semantic Web, I argue that it is a clear and well-defined project, which, despite some authoritative views to the contrary, is not a promising reality and will probably fail in the same way AI has failed in the past. Regarding Web 2.0, I argue that, although it is a rather ill-defined project, which lacks a clear explanation of its nature and scope, it does have the potentiality of becoming a success (and indeed it is already, as part of the new phenomenon of Cloud Computing) because it leverages the only semantic engines available so far in nature, us.

I conclude by suggesting what other changes might be expected in the future of our digital environment.

Comments

  1. read the paper, Luciano, and am very very happy somebody finally is 'clearly and distinctively' telling it like it is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Mr Floridi,

    was reading your paper for my masters' exam preparation and I must say was delighted by it.

    It was good to see that some step back and had a look at it without getting entangled in the technological side of the web.

    I hope you statement that humans are the only "semantic engine" will endure for a long time, otherwise we might make ourselves redundant, as so many times before.

    Nevertheless I hope the Semantic Web or maybe better MetaSyntactic Web will happen eventually to increase the ease the burden of information retrieval. In this context i am looking forward to the release of full-flavored promised search engine "Wolfram Alpha" (www.wolframalpha.com).

    The main question might be how much "semantic" information can one get out of the "web 2.0" to enrich "semantic" searches on the web.

    Thank you for you paper!

    Christian Sax

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the importance of being pedantic (series: notes to myself)

Mind the app - considerations on the ethical risks of COVID-19 apps

Call for expressions of interest: research position for a project on Digital Sovereignty and the Governance, Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (GELSI) of digital innovation.

Il sapore della felicità condivisa

On the art of biting one's own tongue (series: notes to myself)

Gauss Professorship

Between a rock and a hard place: Elon Musk's open letter and the Italian ban of Chat-GPT

ECAP 2008

On Philosophy's envy of her four sisters (series: notes to myself)

On Pascal and the door of a Church (series: notes to myself)