Reflections on Stephen Wolfram's A New Kind of Science, by Ray Kurzweil

You may definitely not read the book, but this review is not to be missed: Reflections on Stephen Wolfram's A New Kind of Science, by Ray Kurzweil (it explains why you may read something else instead, Kant, for example).

Comments

  1. Did you actually read what you linked to?

    Its final statement is: "I believe the book to be an important work of ontology."

    Yea, sure sounds like he is dimissing it and suggesting you read something else.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I did read it. And no, unfortunately, a phrase out of context makes no difference. Anyone who reads Kurzweil's review will realise that it is not positive and that there are better and far more important work of ontology to read. My suggestion is to start with Kant.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

(revised on Medium) On a sachet of brown sugar (series: notes to myself)

Breve commento su "Non è il mio lutto" e la morte di Berlusconi.

Onlife: Sulla morte di Corman McCarthy e "the best writers" della letteratura americana

Sulla morte come "distanza che si apre nella vita"

The Loebner Prize from a judge's perspective

On the importance of being pedantic (series: notes to myself)

On the art of biting one's own tongue (series: notes to myself)

Mind the app - considerations on the ethical risks of COVID-19 apps