Reflections on Stephen Wolfram's A New Kind of Science, by Ray Kurzweil

You may definitely not read the book, but this review is not to be missed: Reflections on Stephen Wolfram's A New Kind of Science, by Ray Kurzweil (it explains why you may read something else instead, Kant, for example).

Comments

  1. Did you actually read what you linked to?

    Its final statement is: "I believe the book to be an important work of ontology."

    Yea, sure sounds like he is dimissing it and suggesting you read something else.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I did read it. And no, unfortunately, a phrase out of context makes no difference. Anyone who reads Kurzweil's review will realise that it is not positive and that there are better and far more important work of ontology to read. My suggestion is to start with Kant.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mind the app - considerations on the ethical risks of COVID-19 apps

On the importance of being pedantic (series: notes to myself)

On the value of taking care of the roses (series: notes to myself)

"Notes to myself" available on Amazon

Between a rock and a hard place: Elon Musk's open letter and the Italian ban of Chat-GPT

The Loebner Prize from a judge's perspective

Call for expressions of interest: research position for a project on Digital Sovereignty and the Governance, Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (GELSI) of digital innovation.

(revised on Medium) On Kia and Pelé (series: notes to myself)

Pandemic lesson: the disappearance of externalities

(revised on Medium) On why publishing (series: notes to myself)