Commons-based peer production and the medical information monopoly

"A decade ago I consulted with a federal health agency on the redesign of its website. They wanted to use the web to make more health care information readily available to more people, but they didn't have much to offer. My suggestion was to leverage what we now call commons-based peer production, which then was mostly happening on the Usenet. The feds were deeply conflicted about that. They knew people were exchanging lots of useful information in newsgroups. But they also knew there was a lot of quackery, and they couldn't imagine themselves separating the wheat from the chaff. It was a valid concern. There was no way that they, alone, could patrol the likes of alt.support.arthritis and highlight the most useful advice for, say, people recovering from knee replacement."
[read more by following the url]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

(revised on Medium) On the expression "to know better" (series: notes to myself)

The Loebner Prize from a judge's perspective

Breve commento su "Non è il mio lutto" e la morte di Berlusconi.

Sulla morte come "distanza che si apre nella vita"

(revised on Medium) On a sachet of brown sugar (series: notes to myself)

Onlife: Sulla morte di Corman McCarthy e "the best writers" della letteratura americana

Mind the app - considerations on the ethical risks of COVID-19 apps

"Notes to myself" available on Amazon